banner
article2photo
byline
in this issue
article1
article2
article3
article4

 
In a couple of areas of the country our offices work with independent escrow companies who are owned by individuals who have no affiliation to a title insurance company. They simply provide escrow services. As a result, our Companies regularly provide title services and work closely with the escrow company to successfully close a transaction. In Friday Harbor, Washington, our Chicago Title office regularly handles title–only transactions from independent escrow companies or law firms.

Chicago Title was being asked to insure title in a sale where an independent escrow company was acting as the settlement agent. The independent escrow company delivered to Chicago Title two original powers of attorney (POA), the deed and deed of trust for recordation. There were two sellers who appointed the same person to act as their attorney–in–fact.

Chicago Title's Debbie Sutliff received the documents to record. She carefully reviewed the documents to ensure legal descriptions were attached, they were fully executed and the POAs did authorize the attorney–in–fact to sell the property and execute the required documents at closing.

During her review, Debbie noticed the attorney–in–fact only signed the grantors' names on the deed instead of signing her name as the sellers' attorney–in–fact. Debbie brought the deed and her concerns to the manager's attention who agreed with her findings.

Debbie contacted the escrow officer and explained the deed needed to be corrected and re–executed. The escrow officer jumped in her car and drove to Chicago Title to pick up the deed. Thirty minutes later the escrow officer returned with a corrected and re–executed deed. However, the new signatures were nowhere near the same as the previous signatures.

Once again Debbie brought her finding to the manager's attention. The manager, Lori Ronhaar contacted the escrow officer in order to obtain the phone number for the attorney–in–fact. The escrow officer said she had to call her back. About ten minutes later the escrow officer called back with a phone number.

The manager called the attorney–in–fact to discuss the circumstances under which she signed the deed. The attorney–in–fact said she signed the deed only once — the day before. However, when asked, the attorney–in–fact also told Lori that she had not signed the corrected deed. In fact, the attorney–in–fact proceeded to complain to Lori about all the problems she had with this file. Turns out, the attorney–in–fact was not even in town anymore.

Lori explained the original deed was not executed properly and it must be corrected. The attorney–in–fact was very frustrated. She stated she would have signed the document properly if only the escrow officer had told her how.

Lori notified the owner of the independent escrow company. Eventually, a corrected deed was executed by the appropriate parties and recorded by Chicago Title.

 

 
 

MORAL OF THE STORY

Forgery is never acceptable. It turns out the independent escrow company's escrow officer, in an attempt to cover her tracks, called the attorney–in–fact 10 minutes before the title officer to ask her if she could sign the new deed on her behalf. The attorney–in–fact, being inexperienced, said, "Yes," because she was trying to help out her friends who were trying to sell their house.

The escrow officer made this call in the 10 minutes it took her to call Lori back to give her the attorney–in–fact's phone number.

Debbie performed her due diligence before blindly recording a deed which could have been challenged and considered invalid resulting in a total failure of title. As a result, she has been rewarded $1,500 along with a letter of recognition from the Company. Great job Debbie!

 
 

 

 
  SHARE  
 
 
footer_line
 
stop fraud! share
 
footer_line
 
 
FNF Home